During the third, regular semester:
• Student develops a reading list and a formal thesis proposal
which will be defended during the oral exam. The specific
requirements of the formal thesis proposal are determined
by the thesis advisor, so students must consult with their
advisor as often as necessary to understand what is expected.
Students must submit a prepared reading list to their advisor
for final approval.
• Student submits a draft of the thesis proposal to the director
for comments and approval. As soon as the advisor/director
approves, student, in consultation with the advisor and reader,
sets a date for the oral (comprehensive) exam and gives a
copy of the approved proposal and reading list to the reader.
Student must give the approved proposal and reading list to
the reader and advisor at least one week in advance of the
scheduled exam.
By the end of the third, regular semester:
• Student completes (oral) M.A. Comprehensive Exam.
• Upon successful completion of the M.A. Exam, student may
register for thesis credits, i.e., Ling. 799, for the fourth,
final semester.
Design of the Thesis/Exam Committee:
The student's thesis committee is the same as the exam committee.
The thesis/exam committee consists of two faculty members
in the Linguistics Program - a thesis advisor/director (must
be core faculty) and a reader. It is the student's responsibility
to choose his/her committee members and to make explicit the
chosen topic area and schedule for completion of the M.A.
thesis so that the potential committee members know what to
expect. The committee should be formed by the beginning of
the student's third semester.
Format of the M.A. Comprehensive Exam:
The M.A. Comprehensive Exam consists of 1) a formal presentation
of the thesis proposal by the student, and 2) a comprehensive
oral examination of the proposal and general linguistic questions
related to the thesis topic by the committee. The general
linguistic questions related to the thesis topic assume knowledge
and understanding of the references given on the student's
prepared reading list. Details of the formal presentation
of the thesis proposal are determined by the director/advisor.
Content of the Exam (Reading list and Thesis
Proposal):
• The content of the exam is based on the research proposal
and reading list prepared by the student. All questions directed
toward the student will have relevance to the proposal topic,
although they may come from a variety of linguistic perspectives
that the student has studied in the Program (based on reading
list).
• The student chooses their thesis topic in consultation with
the thesis advisor. The topic should be original research,
careful replication of previously published research, or an
in-depth literature review with original observations. Final
approval of the thesis topic is the responsibility of the
thesis advisor.
• There is no standard reading list for this exam; it is individualized
for each student, depending on the student's proposed thesis
topic and coursework completed. The reading list is a compilation
of the relevant readings done throughout coursework, including
papers/proposals, and any additional readings that the committee
members deem appropriate. The content of the exam is limited
to the references on the reading list. Students must get final
approval on the reading list from their thesis advisor/director
prior to the exam and must give a copy of the approved reading
list to the reader.
Format of the Thesis Proposal:
The student will write a detailed thesis proposal in consultation
with the thesis advisor. Although the exact specifications
of the thesis proposal must be determined in consultation
with the thesis advisor, it generally includes the following:
1) A statement of the research problem;
2) A preliminary review of the relevant literature;
3) A detailed presentation of the hypotheses;
4) A discussion of proposed methodology for
data collection
• Students who will be collecting data from human subjects
must include a copy of a completed application for review
of research on human subjects submitted to the Ethics Review
Committee. (These forms are obtained from the Graduate School
or from the Chair of the Linguistics Program Ethics Committee).
• Students who are working with students from specific institutions
(e.g., foreign language departments, local schools, the English
Program for Internationals) must have evidence of the institution's
approval for conducting the proposed research, such as a letter
from a director or teacher acknowledging approval or student
may design a form for the director or teacher to sign.
5) A discussion of proposed methodology for
data analyses
Students who will be doing statistical analyses are advised
to have a consultation with the Statistical
Laboratory (Stat Lab) to determine (1) exactly which statistics
are appropriate for the research design and questions, and
(2) if the research design or methodology should be modified
to allow appropriate statistical analyses for the hypotheses/research
question.
6) A discussion of the relevance and significance
of the proposed study.
Scheduling of the M.A. Comprehensive Exam:
The exam may be held at any time agreed upon by all parties
(student and thesis committee members). This exam is normally
held late in the student's third semester in the M.A. program
or early in the fourth semester. The approved thesis proposal
and reading list must be submitted to the thesis advisor and
reader no less than one week in advance of the oral exam.
Evaluation of the M.A. Comprehensive Exam:
The comprehensive exam (i.e., presentation of proposal and
oral exam) is evaluated by the committee as follows:
• PASS (with required modifications)
• FAIL
Evaluation takes place immediately after the
exam and the student is notified at that time of the outcome.
The committee is responsible for recommending modifications
to the proposal as necessary and for articulating all required
modifications (e.g., changes, enhancements, etc.) for the
student's thesis. The student must complete all modifications
(and required conditions) to the satisfaction of the thesis
advisor within one month of the oral exam or
be subject to re-examination. The thesis proposal, either
as presented or revised, must be approved by the thesis advisor
before the candidate may proceed with further work on the
thesis.
• The thesis advisor notifies the Linguistics Program secretary
in writing of a successful outcome.
• If the oral exam is deemed unsatisfactory (FAIL), or the
modifications to the thesis proposal are not satisfactory,
the student may choose to discontinue their work with that
advisor, and start again with a new advisor.