|
|
COLLOQUIA & CONFERENCES
WHY ARE THE PARTS OF ABSOLUTE
SPACE IMMOBILE?
Nicholas Huggett
Department of Philosophy
University of Illinois at Chicago
January 18, 2007
Thursday, 5:00pm-7:00pm
Nursing, Room 127
In his Principia and in the earlier unpublished De
Gravitatione, Newton claims against Descartes that the parts of
absolute space cannot move. He offers two arguments for this claim. One of
them has puzzled and intrigued a number of commentators because it appeals
to a striking un-'Newtonian' account of the identity of
points: he says that they only have their individuality in virtue of their
mutual relations. Does this mean, as DiSalle has suggested, that the
supposition of a universe being created elsewhere is nonsense? That is,
does Newton agree with Leibniz on this point? To answer this question we
need to understand just what Newton's argument is. I will explain why
earlier readings are faulty and how best to understand him. We will see,
however, that Newton cannot after all uphold the argument becuase its
premises imply that all motion is relative. We cannot, therefore, see any
deep agreement between Newton and Leibniz regarding 'shifts'.
 |
|