Go to USC home page USC Logo USC: ARTS AND SCIENCES: DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES | PHILOSOPHY HOME PAGE | CHAIR'S STATEMENT

FACULTY

GRADUATE STUDENTS

COLLOQUIUM CALENDAR

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM

GRADUATE PROGRAM

GRADUATE PLACEMENT

CONTACT US

MASTER SCHEDULE

UNDERGRADUATE BULLETIN

GRADUATE BULLETIN

ACADEMIC CALENDARS

USC LIBRARIES

CAS COMPUTING & IT

USC COMPUTER SERVICES

ABOUT COLUMBIA SC

RESTRICTED ACCESS:
Faculty | Graduate Students
USC   THIS SITE
COLLOQUIA & CONFERENCES
WHY ARE THE PARTS OF ABSOLUTE SPACE IMMOBILE?
 
Nicholas Huggett
Department of Philosophy
University of Illinois at Chicago

 
January 18, 2007
Thursday, 5:00pm-7:00pm
Nursing, Room 127

 
In his Principia and in the earlier unpublished De Gravitatione, Newton claims against Descartes that the parts of absolute space cannot move. He offers two arguments for this claim. One of them has puzzled and intrigued a number of commentators because it appeals to a striking — un-'Newtonian' — account of the identity of points: he says that they only have their individuality in virtue of their mutual relations. Does this mean, as DiSalle has suggested, that the supposition of a universe being created elsewhere is nonsense? That is, does Newton agree with Leibniz on this point? To answer this question we need to understand just what Newton's argument is. I will explain why earlier readings are faulty and how best to understand him. We will see, however, that Newton cannot after all uphold the argument becuase its premises imply that all motion is relative. We cannot, therefore, see any deep agreement between Newton and Leibniz regarding 'shifts'.
RETURN TO TOP
USC LINKS: DIRECTORY MAP EVENTS VIP
SITE INFORMATION