web statistics





Legacy
, Vol. 1, No. 1, July 1996, pp.1, 14-15


H.L. Hunley
Assessment Expedition Fieldwork Completed

By Christopher F. Amer, Steven D. Smith and Jonathan M. Leader




Crew from 1996 expedition.
The South Carolina Hunley Commission and the U.S. Navy/Naval Historical Center initiated on 29 April a jointly funded assessment survey of the remains of the submarine H.L. Hunley.  The survey was conducted during a five-and-one-half-week period.  The principal goals of this survey were to confirm the identity of the object at the site as the Hunley, document the site to the extent conditions would permit, ascertain condition of the hull, and to evaluate the feasibility of a future recovery project. The principal parties tasked to carry out this expedition were the National Park Service-Submerged Cultural Resource Unit (NPS-SCRU), South Carolina Institute
of Archaeology and Anthropology-Underwater Archaeology Division (SCIAA),  Naval Historical Center-Underwater Archaeology Program (NHC), and the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

Research vessels Anita and C-Hawk on Hunley site. Mr. Daniel Lenihan (NPS-SCRU) and Mr. Christopher Amer (SCIAA) were Co-Principal Investigators for the project and Mr. Larry Murphy (NPS-SCRU) was Field Director. The U.S. Coast Guard, the Naval Weapons Station, and Naval Criminal Investigative Service provided site security.  A South Carolina Educational Television crew lived with the archaeology crew and documented all phases of the project.  Several private companies and not-for-profit groups donated their unique expertise and an array of state of the art technology for remote sensing, geology, marine biology, sedimentology, and corrosion engineering.  These groups include Marine Sonic Technology, Inc., Edgetech Corporation, Oceaneering Inc., Geometrics Inc., Sandia Research Associates, Inc., Jim Graham and Associates, and the Institute of Nautical Archaeology. 

Phase One of the H.L. Hunley Expedition was carried out from 29 April  through 6 May (Figure 2).  This Phase consisted of non-invasive, remote sensing using a marine proton magnetometer, a RoxAnn bottom classification unit, a side-scan sonar, and a digital sub-bottom profiler.  This sophisticated magnetic and acoustic sensing equipment relocated the site of the Hunley, defined the limits of this archaeological site, discovered other areas possibly associated with the site, and profiled the depth of the submarine below the sediments.  Additionally, information from cores taken around the site provided environmental contextual information to assist in the assessment.

After several “down days” due to a series of weather fronts passing through the region Phase Two began on 9 May. This phase was designed to uncover and positively identify the Hunley by discovering and recording several of the hull attributes unique to the submarine.  Attributes included the forward and aft hatches with portholes and cutwaters forward of the hatches (Figure 3), torpedo spar, diving planes, air box and snorkel, propeller, rudder, and external iron keel ballast.  On 17 May, the identity of the Hunley was confirmed with the identification of five of the seven attributes unique to the vessel.  While areas of the hull were exposed and being recorded, Mr. Dan Polly, a corrosion engineer from Jim Graham and Associates, conducted studies of the corrosion levels of the metal. Both phases were hindered by high winds and heavy seas.


Underwater view of forward hatch.
Once Phase Two was completed the submarine was reburied under protective sediments.  The site of this significant find is currently protected by physical barriers, electronic surveillance and sensing device to provide continuous security.  The analysis of the data gathered during this expedition will take many months to evaluate.  However, some preliminary results include the following:  The Hunley is completely buried in the harbor sediments, lying 45 degrees on starboard side, bow facing the shore, dive planes elevated.  The evidence suggests that, after the initial sinking, the hull became buried within 10 to 15 years in a single event.  The hull still contains much metal, however there is active corrosion taking place throughout the vessel.  There is little apparent damage to the hull in the areas investigated (less than one-quarter of the vessel).  However, the forward face of forward hatch combing is fractured, possibly where a port hole once existed.

The construction of the submarine, H. L. Hunley, at the Park and Lyons machine shop in Mobile, Alabama in 1863 was overseen by one Lieutenant William Alexander.  Some 40 years later, Lieutenant Alexander published a description and sketch of the vessel in the New Orleans Picayune.  Architecturally, the Hunley differs in a number of ways from Alexander's description and bears much more similarity to Conrad Wise Chapman's painting of the vessel done shortly after it was built.  The hull investigated has a hydrodynamic shape with smooth lines converging at bow and stern.  The hull is 39 feet, 5 inches long, and approximately 3 feet, 10 inches in diameter.  A 4-3/4-inch external keel runs along the bottom of the hull.  Both hatches are present, each located approximately 9 feet from either end of the hull.  Each hatch coaming contains a small view port on its port (left) side, while the forward hatch coaming apparently contained one facing forward but which is broken.  The dimensions and configuration of the hatches approximate those noted by Alexander.  A cutwater, formed from a single plate of iron, angles forward from the forward hatch toward the bow.  The air box/snorkel is located directly aft of the forward hatch, although only stubs of the snorkel tubes remain.  Between the air box and the aft hatch, evenly spaced along the hull, and to either side of the centerline, are 5 pairs of flat-glass deadlights, presumably to facilitate illumination of the interior of the vessel.  The port dive plane, located below the air box is 6 feet, 10 inches long (longer than the 5 feet noted by Alexander), 8-1/2 inches wide, and pivoted on a 3-inch pivot pin.  No evidence for a spar was found during the assessment.

When all of the studies have been completed a final report of the expedition and recommendations for the preservation and recovery of H.L. Hunley will be delivered to the South Carolina Hunley Commission and U.S. Navy.



Download a PDF of webpage-printer friendly. Return to Project Page



Maritime Research Division, South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, USC




Return to SCIAA-MRD homepage.