
![]() |
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program | (Raleigh, NC) |
| "LIDAR Posting Density and Physiography: Effects on DTM Accuracy and Flood Zoning" | ||
| Project Background | Methodology | Preliminary Results |
|
|
||
|
Abstract |
||
|
Recently a number of local
communities and a few statewide agencies have undertaken efforts to acquire
more accurate digital elevation surfaces for various applications including
flood hazard mapping. The technology most widely adopted for this purpose has
been LIDAR remote sensing. The acquisition of a spatially dense set of
elevation postings representing the "bare" ground may be the greatest factor
in deriving an accurate elevation surface. Creating such a dense elevation
dataset using LIDAR remote sensing requires two elements - a high raw posting
density during the collection phase and rigorous post-processing to identify
the "ground" returns. A higher posting density generally requires
significantly higher cost associated with the LIDAR sensor and the addition of
technical personnel time and computing resources (processor speed, RAM,
storage space, etc.) that are required to process higher posting densities to
produce digital elevation models (DEMs) of the bare ground. The goal of this
research is to develop a relationship between LIDAR posting density and DEM
accuracy. Specifications for data collection/processing in future mapping
efforts could use this empirical relationship to match target accuracy
requirements with data collection/processing parameters. For this research, a
simple GIS simulation was developed in order to create a LIDAR data collection
over two GIS generated surfaces. The vertical and surface form accuracy of
the resulting DEMs are compared to the posting density in order to establish
the relationship between these variables. The research further investigates
the sensitivity of horizontal accuracy (for flood extent delineation) using
the generated DEMs. The results indicate that these relationships exist and
validate the need for an empirical study to explore the patterns further. |
||
Last updated 25 Jul 2003
Send comments to tullis@gwm.sc.edu