Go to USC home page USC Logo USC: ARTS AND SCIENCES: DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES | PHILOSOPHY HOME PAGE | COLLOQUIUM CALENDAR

FACULTY

GRADUATE STUDENTS

COLLOQUIUM CALENDAR

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM

GRADUATE PROGRAM

GRADUATE PLACEMENT

CONTACT US

MASTER SCHEDULE

UNDERGRADUATE BULLETIN

GRADUATE BULLETIN

ACADEMIC CALENDARS

USC LIBRARIES

CAS COMPUTING & IT

USC COMPUTER SERVICES

ABOUT COLUMBIA SC

RESTRICTED ACCESS:
Faculty | Graduate Students
USC   THIS SITE
COLLOQUIA & CONFERENCES
DREAMING
 
Jody Azzouni
Department of Philosophy
Tufts University

 
September 25, 2003
Thursday, 4:00pm-6:00pm
Nursing, Room 125

 
Two versions of "the" dreaming argument are distinguished. A strong version of the argument, which uses very weak premises, in particular, which does not require assumptions about the epistemic relevance of "possibilities," is here examined. It is shown how considerations involving both impaired judgment and lucid dreaming are entangled in ways that give the argument plausibility. An "intoxication" argument (how do I know that I'm not drunk right now?) is used to show that psychological states that induce poor judgment are not themselves (alone) powerful enough to motivate skepticism; and plausible symmetry conditions on confusion (that if A can be confused with B, then B should be confusable with A as well), show that "lucid dream" considerations, if powerful enough to motivate skepticism, are not compatible with what actual dreams are like.
RETURN TO TOP
USC LINKS: DIRECTORY MAP EVENTS VIP
SITE INFORMATION