|
|
COLLOQUIA & CONFERENCES
ALIENATED MASTERPIECE: GLOBALIZING ADORNO'S DIALECTIC
OF ENLIGHTENMENT
Lambert Zuidervaart
Institute for Christian Studies
and University of Toronto
November 18, 2005
Friday, 4:00pm-6:00pm
Nursing, Room 127
Contemporary struggles over globalization echo debates about modernization
in the previous two centuries. How should we understand comprehensive
theories of progress? By what criteria should supposed improvements in
society be judged? Nearly sixty years ago Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic
of Enlightenment argued that Western modernization has not delivered what
it promises. Modernization is, one could say, an "alienated masterpiece."
The same label fits this much-misinterpreted book. Adorno's own successors,
led by Jrgen Habermas, have made an adequate reception difficult. This
paper aims to retrieve Theodor W. Adorno's social critique for the age of
globalization.
Habermas argues that Adorno's "critique of instrumental reason" removes the
normative foundations for Critical Theory. But Habermas's alternative
misses two connections central to Adorno's critique: (1) between
technological mastery of nature and social domination of some people by
others, and (2) between cultural differentiation and economic exploitation.
Under conditions of modernization, so-called progress in one respect incurs
regress in another. Adorno could not find a way out of this dilemma.
As an alternative to both Habermas and Adorno, I propose the normative
notion of "differential transformation." Neither "modern" endorsement nor
"postmodern" rejection suffices as a stance toward globalization. Instead
we must ask what simultaneous and mutually reinforcing changes--both at
differing levels of social institutions, cultural practices, and
interpersonal relations, and at structural interfaces among economy,
polity, and culture--would allow societal principles such as justice and
solidarity better to hold sway. To pursue such questions would be a sign of
postsecular hope.
 |
|