Go to USC home page USC Logo USC: ARTS AND SCIENCES: DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES | PHILOSOPHY HOME PAGE | CHAIR'S STATEMENT

CHAIR'S STATEMENT

FACULTY

GRADUATE STUDENTS

COLLOQUIUM CALENDAR

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM

GRADUATE PROGRAM

GRADUATE PLACEMENT

MASTER SCHEDULE

UNDERGRADUATE BULLETIN

GRADUATE BULLETIN

ACADEMIC CALENDARS

USC LIBRARIES

CAS COMPUTING & IT

USC COMPUTER SERVICES

ABOUT COLUMBIA SC

RESTRICTED ACCESS:
Faculty | Graduate Students
USC   THIS SITE
COLLOQUIA & CONFERENCES
INTERPRETING THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION: THE CASE FOR OPTICS
 
Mark Smith
Department of History
University of Missouri

 
October 6, 2006
Friday, 3:30pm-5:30pm
Nursing, Room 127

 
It has long been fashionable among medievalists to approach the transition from medieval to early modern science and its culmination in the so-called Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century in evolutionary rather than revolutionary terms. A particularly compelling example of this approach is David Lindberg's analysis of Kepler's account of retinal imaging, which he reduces to a natural outgrowth of the medieval Perspectivist theory of light and sight. Card-carrying medievalist thought I am (and erstwhile student of Lindberg's to boot), I will contravene his analysis in this paper by showing that, far from evolutionary, the transition from Perspectivist to Keplerian optics was in fact revolutionary in a fundamentally Kuhnian way.
RETURN TO TOP
USC LINKS: DIRECTORY MAP EVENTS VIP
SITE INFORMATION