|
|
COLLOQUIA & CONFERENCES
THOUGHT AS SEEING WHAT EXCEEDS THE POSSIBILITY OF
THINKING: SKEPSIS, TRUTH AND THE PROBLEM OF
WHAT IS MODERN IN NICHOLAS OF CUSA
Daniel O'Connell
Department of Philosophy
University of South Carolina
November 10, 2006
Friday, 3:30pm-5:30pm
Nursing, Room 127
Ever since Ernst Cassirer asserted (1927) that Nicholas of Cusa or Cusanus
was "the first modern thinker," various attempts have been made to
characterize or identify this "modernity" in Cusa. Further debates have
arisen among scholars in Germany and the United States about the value of
comparing Cusanus with those philosophers who came after him (e.g.,
Descartes or Kant), with some [W. Beierwaltes] finding such comparisons
useless or empty, because of Cusa's lack of direct historical influence on
these philosophers. These philosophers advocate reading Cusanus in light of
his historical sources (e.g., Proclus Diadochus and Dionysius the
Areopagite) and, unsuprisingly, do not classify Cusa as a "modern" thinker
in the philosophical sense. They tend to see him as a very original
Medieval thinker, but one who at most opened the door to modern paths of
thought, which were to emerge both in Philosophy and in the sciences. Other
recent readings of early modern literature [V. Lobsien] have imitated
Cassirer insofar as they have told a story of early modern literature which
begins with Cusanus, and sees Cusanus connected to later thinkers not so
much by specific propositions but rather by his skeptical attitude and
method. In this paper I will offer a further contribution to the debate by
an examination of (a) Cusa's propositions concerning truth (veritas), (b)
his skeptical attitude towards human knowledge of this truth (and a brief
contrast with Descartes' skepticism), and (c) a late development in his
thought, his notion of vision or sight. This notion of vision or sight
suggests both (i) that there is some resolution to the tensions inherent
in the skeptical attitude, even if they are never removed entirely and
(ii) that the medieval/modern debate surrounding Cusanus can be settled
only if we begin to see that what is "medieval" and what is "modern" about
Cusanus can oftentimes be found united in one and the same proposition
outlook.
 |
|