|
|
COLLOQUIA & CONFERENCES
SUÁREZ AND THE PROBLEM OF IMMORTALITY
James South
Department of Philosophy
Marquette University
December 8, 2006
Friday, 3:30pm-5:30pm
Nursing, Room 127
In 1500, Pietro Pomponazzi told a classroom full of students that two
conditions needed to be met in order to show that the soul is immortal: the
soul (or the intellect at any rate) must be 1) free from bodily location
and 2) free from the mediating role of bodily powers-in his technical
language, the body could be neither a subject nor an object for an immortal
intellective soul. It was another sixteen years before Pomponazzi published
his work On the Immortality of the Soul in which he argued that neither
condition could be defended philosophically. Of course, that was three
years after the Fifth Lateran Council in its eighth session declared that
there were three most pernicious errors corrupting the minds of the
faithful: that the rational soul is mortal, that there is one rational soul
for all humans, and teaching one or the other of these errors as true
at
least according to philosophy.
What I want to do in my talk is connect the later Jesuit thinker, Francisco
Suárez (15481617) to Pomponazzi's challenge. Suárez certainly knew
Pomopnazzi's work, although most scholars writing on Suárez situate him in
the context of the tradition of scholastic thought rather than the more
secular Aristotelianism present in Italian universities. In their defense,
Suárez typically situates himself that way. Nonetheless, I want to show
that a careful reading of Suárez on immortality shows that his thought on
key issues has been decisively shaped by the challenge thrown down by
Pomponazzi, and that it is his attempt to meet that challenge that explains
why he holds some of his most distinctive views about the intellect and its
powers. Indeed, in meeting the challenge, Suárez argues himself into a kind
of incipient Cartesian dualism.
 |
|