Go to USC home page USC Logo USC: ARTS AND SCIENCES: SCIENCE STUDIES
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES | SCIENCE STUDIES HOME | SITE INFO

SCIENCE STUDIES AT USC

nanoSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES

GENERAL INFORMATION

EVENTS CALENDAR
USC   THIS SITE
SCIENCE STUDIES EVENTS
ENGINEERING CRITERIA ON INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
 
Pieter E. Vermaas
Department of Philosophy
Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

 
March 2, 2004
Tuesday, 12:30pm
Sumwalt College, Room 102

 
In this paper, I consider the problem of interpreting quantum mechanics from a 'meta-interpretational' perspective and then from an engineering point of view.
 
I argue firstly that this problem has evolved in part into the problem of selecting tenable interpretations from a set of available interpretations. We lack the means to make this selection. There is consensus that interpretations should be consistent and empirically adequate. But these criteria are not particularly discriminative. Locality criteria and conditions on the algebraic structure on descriptions of physical systems are discriminative but are not generally accepted. Hence, in order to select the tenable interpretations we should reach consensus on the existing discriminative criteria, or on new ones.
 
Secondly I discuss the possibility that the use of quantum mechanics in engineering may lead to such new criteria. I propose a criterion that requires that interpretations ascribe the physical properties to technical artefacts that are entailed by the ascription of technical functions to those artefacts. And I propose one that requires that interpretations ascribe the physical properties represented by engineering sketches.
 
I give some illustrations, and no formulas.
RETURN TO TOP
USC LINKS: DIRECTORY MAP EVENTS VIP
SITE INFORMATION