Go to USC home page USC Logo USC: ARTS AND SCIENCES: SCIENCE STUDIES
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES | SCIENCE STUDIES HOME | SITE INFO

SCIENCE STUDIES AT USC

nanoSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES

GENERAL INFORMATION

EVENTS CALENDAR
USC   THIS SITE
SCIENCE STUDIES EVENTS
STM, MODELING AND ALL THAT: HOW NOT TO BE A REALIST ABOUT MICROSCOPY
 
Otávio Bueno
Department of Philosophy
University of South Carolina

 
April 20, 2005
Wednesday, 12:30pm-2:00pm
Sumwalt College, Room 102

 
The issue of microscopic reality is intriguing and has fascinated scientists and philosophers alike. Under what conditions are researchers entitled to know that the images produced by a microscope correspond to features found in the sample, and are not just artifacts of the instrument? Ian Hacking has famously articulated some of these conditions, and provided four arguments in support of them. He concluded that, as long as these conditions are met, researchers have reason to believe that the entities detected by microscopes exist (a position called "entity realism"; see Hacking 1981, 1983). Recently, Paul Humphreys reexamined Hacking's arguments and, by slightly changing them, concluded that they supported a different conclusion: we should be realists about the properties that are measured by the corresponding microscopes (a position called "property cluster realism"; see Humphreys 2004). In this paper, by examining key features of scanning tunneling microscopy, I argue that neither in Hacking's formulation nor in Humphreys' these arguments hold, and I provide an alternative, more deflationary, understanding of microscopic reality.
RETURN TO TOP
USC LINKS: DIRECTORY MAP EVENTS VIP
SITE INFORMATION