Go to USC home page USC Logo USC: ARTS AND SCIENCES: SCIENCE STUDIES
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES | SCIENCE STUDIES HOME | SITE INFO

SCIENCE STUDIES AT USC

nanoSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES

GENERAL INFORMATION

EVENTS CALENDAR
USC   THIS SITE
SCIENCE STUDIES EVENTS
THE ROLE OF METAPHOR IN THE DISCUSSION OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
 
Joseph Pitt
Department of Philosophy
Virginia Tech

 
April 4, 2006
Tuesday, 12:30pm-2:00pm
Sumwalt College, Room 102

 
New Ideas can be troubling in a variety of ways. In many cases we understand that they pose a challenge to the status quo, but we are not really sure what that challenge is. Nor do we know how to judge the claims, positive and negative, made by proponents and detractors. The proponents of new ideas have often employed metaphors to make the unfamiliar appear less threatening. Metaphors are used to explain the unfamiliar by appealing to the familiar and drawing connections between them in ways thought to illuminate and demystify the unfamiliar. In this presentation, I look at the use of metaphor in two different oddly similar cases to see if they are successful in explaining the new and making us feel better about it. The first case is Galileo's appeal to both geometry and the Venetian water barges to develop a theory of the tides that in turn can only be explained by appealing to the motion of the earth. The second is Richard Smalley's attack on the feasibility of nanobots. As we shall see, both arguments are striking similar in form. We know Galileo's argument fails -- but what about Smalley's?
RETURN TO TOP
USC LINKS: DIRECTORY MAP EVENTS VIP
SITE INFORMATION