.
. ——————————————————————————————————————————————
SOCIOLOGY OF LAW
Visions of a Scholarly Tradition

by Mathieu Deflem.|.deflem@sc.edu.

Published by Cambridge University Press. 2008. 
ISBN: 978-0-521-67392-1 (paperback).|.978-0-521-85725-3 (hardback) 376 pages.
——————————————————————————————————————————————

Chapter 2 Details.|.Introduction.|.1.|.2.|.3.|.4.|.5.|.6.|.7.|.8.|.9.|.10.|.11.|.12.|.Conclusion.|.Home
——————————————————————————————————————————————
www.socoflaw.net
XSociology of Law by Mathieu Deflem - Chapter 2
.
.
CHAPTER 2: MAX WEBER ON THE RATIONALIZATION OF LAW 
——————————————————————————————————————————————
Overview

Interpretive Sociology 

Max Weber (1864—1920): “The task of sociology, according to Weber, is to understand human conduct inasmuch as it is meaningful.” (p.38)
Ideal-Type and Elective Affinity 
“Ideal-types are constructed by abstracting and combining a limited number of elements from reality in order to open up the chaos of empirical events to description and understanding.” (p.40)

“Weber argued that the progressive influence of purposive-rational thought across social institutions showed the theoretical necessity to break through both materialist and idealist models of explanation to indicate the elective affinity (Wahlverwandtschaft) that exists among societal conditions.” (p.41)

The Rationalization of Society: Economy, Politics, and Bureaucracy 
“Weber argues that modern societies are most essentially marked by a high degree of purposive rationalization.” (p.41)
The Rationality of Modern Law 
“Weber specifies the ideal-types of formal and substantive rationality in terms of lawmaking (legislation) and lawfinding (adjudication) as the two central aspects of law.” (p.45)

“According to Weber, the rationalization of modern law in Western societies takes on the specific form of formal rationalization.” (p.46)

The Legacy of Weber 
“The relevance and influence of Weber’s work in modern sociology cannot be neatly demarcated and measured, for there is simply no modern sociology that does not at least situate itself with respect to Weber’s theories and, almost as often, is influenced by many of the key ideas in his work.” (p.48)
——————————————————————————————————————————————

Selected Online Articles (external links) 

Weber, Max. (1920). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. [link to private site] 

Weber, Max. (1922). Basic Concepts of Sociology. Selection from Economy and Society. [link to private site] 

Weber, Max. Various texts in German and English. [sources via the sociosite] 

Max Weber. Ausgewählte Schriften: Potsdamer Internet-Ausgabe. Collection of German original sources. [at the PIA site]

Albrow, Martin. 1975. "Legal Positivism and Bourgeois Materialism: Max Weber's View of the Sociology of Law." British Journal of Law and Society 2(1):14-31.

Lanza-Kaduce, Lonn. 1982. "Formality, Neutrality, and Goal-Rationality: The Legacy of Weber in Analyzing Legal Thought." The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 73(2):533-560.

Ewing, Sally. 1987. “Formal Justice and the Spirit of Capitalism: Max Weber’s Sociology of Law.” Law & Society Review 21(3):487-512.

Trubek, David. 1986. “Max Weber’s Tragic Modernism and the Study of Law in Society.” Review essay. Law & Society Review 20(4):573-598.

Sterling, Joyce S. and Wilbert E. Moore. 1987. "Weber's Analysis of Legal Rationalization: A Critique and Constructive Modification." Sociological Forum 2(1):67-89.

Rocher, Guy. 1988. “La réception de l'œuvre de Max Weber dans la sociologie du droit aux États-Unis.” Droit et Société 9:269-300. [at Les classiques des sciences sociales] 

Feldman, Stephen M. 1991. "An Interpretation of Max Weber's Theory of Law: Metaphysics, Economics, and the Iron Cage of Constitutional Law." Law & Social Inquiry 16(2):205-248.

Savelsberg, Joachim J. 1992. “Law That Does Not Fit Society: Sentencing Guidelines as a Neoclassical Reaction to the Dilemmas of Substantivized Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97(5):1346-1381.

Likhovski, Assaf. 1999. “Protestantism and the Rationalization of English Law: A Variation on a Theme by Weber.” Law and Society Review 33(2):365-391.

Marsh, Robert M. 2000. "Weber's Misunderstanding of Traditional Chinese Law." American Journal of Sociology 106(2):281-302.

Andrini, Simona. 2004. “Max Weber’s Sociology of Law as a Turning Point of His Methodological Approach.” International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie 14(2):143-152.

Kennedy, Duncan. 2004. "The Disenchantment of Logically Formal Legal Rationality or Max Weber's Sociology in the Genealogy of the Contemporary Mode of Western Legal Thought." bepress Legal Series. Working Paper 148. [at The Berkeley Electronic Press] 

Cserne, Peter. 2005. "From Law to Social Science and Back Again --the First Step: Remarks on the Juristic Origin of Some Weberian Concepts." Pp. 457-473 in Ius Unum - Lex Multiplex Liber amicorum Studia Z. Péteri dedicata. Studies in Comparative law, Theory of State and Legal Philosophy, edited by István H. Szilágyi and Máté Paksy. Budapest: Szent István Társulat.  [at The Berkeley Electronic Press] 

Vandenberghe, Frédéric. 2005. “Entre Science et Politique: La Conjonction du Positivisme et du Décisionnisme dans la Sociologie du Droit de Max Weber.” Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 20(1):157-169.

Sahni, Isher-Paul. 2006. “Vanished Mediators: On the Residual Status of Judges in Max Weber’s ‘Sociology of Law’.” Journal of Classical Sociology 6(2):177-194. [at the publisher's site] 

——————————————————————————————————————————————

Go to Chapter 3.|.Other Chapters.|.Reviews.|.Contact.|.About.|.Home

—————————————————————————————————————————
Chapters: Introduction.|.1.|.2.|.3.|.4.|.5.|.6.|.7.|.8.|.9.|.10.|.11.|.12.|.Conclusion.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
© Mathieu Deflem. The pull quotes are copyrighted by Cambridge University Press. 

 www.socoflaw.net
XSociology of Law by Mathieu Deflem - Chapter 2
sociology of law, Mathieu Deflem, Cambridge University Press, law, legal, socio-legal studies, law and society, socoflaw, socoflaw.net, www.socoflaw.net, soclaw, www.soclaw.org, www.soclaw.com, www.soclaw.net, soclaw, www.soclaw.com
Sociology of Law | By Mathieu Deflem | Cambridge University Press