.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
SOCIOLOGY OF LAW
Visions of a Scholarly Tradition

by Mathieu Deflem.|.deflem@sc.edu.

Published by Cambridge University Press. 2008. 
ISBN: 978-0-521-67392-1 (paperback).|.978-0-521-85725-3 (hardback) 376 pages.
——————————————————————————————————————————————

Chapter 4 Details.|.Introduction.|.1.|.2.|.3.|.4.|.5.|.6.|.7.|.8.|.9.|.10.|.11.|.12.|.Conclusion.|.Home
——————————————————————————————————————————————
www.socoflaw.net
XSociology of Law by Mathieu Deflem - Chapter 4
.
.
CHAPTER  4: THE THEORETICAL MOVE TOWARDS THE SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY OF LAW
——————————————————————————————————————————————
Overview

From Scientific Jurisprudence to Legal Sociology: The Eastern-European Tradition

Leon Petrazycki (1867—1931): “...Petrazycki considers the reality of law to be found in the factual experiences of law on the part of human beings.” (p.79)

Nicholas Timasheff (1886—1970): “The primary function and observable consequence of law...is to secure equilibrium by the production of uniform and conforming social behavior in order to achieve peace, security, and organization in society.” (p.84)

Georges Gurvitch (1894—1965): “...Gurvitch develops a dialectical perspective on law that leads to a complex classification of various types of law depending on various levels of social reality and corresponding types of sociological analysis.” (p.85)

Pitirim Sorokin (1889—1970): “Sorokin notes that there may be a discrepancy between official law, i.e., those law-norms which are obligatory for all members of society and protected and enforced by the authoritative power of government, and unofficial law, i.e., law-norms which are not politically overseen but may be restricted to other groups.” (p.88)

The Sociological Movement in Law: European Perspectives 
Eugen Ehrlich (1862—1922): “Ehrlich refers to the whole of law dominating social life, even though it may not have been posited in legal propositions, as living law. The whole of legal propositions he refers to as juristic law.” (p.91)

Theodor Geiger (1891—1952): “Norms are legal norms only when a society is structured as a state with a central power.” (p.92)

From the Psychology to the Sociology of Law 
“In the European cultures of social thought, the early days of sociological thinking on law outside the classics was essentially marked by a theoretical move towards the development of the sociology of law as a specialty area from within scientifically inclined currents in jurisprudence.” (p.93)
——————————————————————————————————————————————

Selected Online Articles (external links)

Clifford-Vaughan, Michalina and Margaret Scotford-Norton. 1967. “Legal Norms and Social Order: Petrazycki, Pareto, Durkheim.” The British Journal of Sociology 18:269-277,369.

Podgorecki, Adam. 1980. "Unrecognized Father of Sociology of Law: Leon Petrazycki." Reflections based on Jan Gorecki's Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrazycki. Law & Society Review 15(1):183-202.

Kojder, Andrzej. 2006. “Leon Petrazycki’s Socio-legal Ideas and their Contemporary Continuation.” Journal of Classical Sociology 6:333-358. [at the publisher's website] 

Sorokin, Pitirim A. 1956. Review of Law and Morality. Harvard Law Review 69(6):1150-1157.

Timasheff, Nicolas S. 1938. “The Sociological Place of Law.” American Journal of Sociology 44(2):206-221.

Timasheff, Nicholas S. (1939) 2002. An Introduction to the Sociology of Law. Transaction edition. Limited preview via Google Books.

Timasheff, Nicolas S. 1941. "Fundamental Problems of the Sociology of Law." The American Catholic Sociological Review 2(4):233-248.

Timasheff, Nicolas S. 1946. "The Sociologist's Contribution to the Law." Virginia Law Review 32(4):818-834.

Timasheff N.S. (1965) 2000. "Where is the American Sociology of Law Going?" [in Russian]. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology 3(2):15-17. [at www.ecsocman.edu.ru; electronic translation via google] 

Schiff, David. 1981. “N. S. Timasheff’s Sociology of Law.” The Modern Law Review 44(4):400-421.

McDonald, Pauline. 1979. "The Legal Sociology of Georges Gurvitch." British Journal of Law and Society 6(1):24-52.

Ehrlich, Eugen. (1913) 1962. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. New York: Russell & Russell. Limited preview via Google Books.

Ehrlich, Eugen. 1922. “The Sociology of Law.” Harvard Law Review 36(2):130-145.

Hertogh, Marc. 2004. "A 'European' Conception of Legal Consciousness: Rediscovering Eugen Ehrlich." Journal of Law and Society 31(4):457-481. [ at the author's website] 

Rheinstein, Max. 1938. "Sociology of Law: Apropos Moll's Translation of Eugen Ehrlich's Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts." International Journal of Ethics 48(2):232-239.

Partridge, P.H. 1961. "Ehrlich's Sociology of Law." Australasian Journal of Philosophy 39(3):201-222.

van Klink, Bart. 2006. "Facts and Norms: The Unfinished Debate between Eugen Ehrlich and Hans Kelsen"  [at the SSRN website] 

Agersnap Torben. 2000. "Theodor Geiger: Pioneer of Sociology in Denmark." Acta Sociologica 43(4):325-330.

——————————————————————————————————————————————

Go to Chapter 5.|.Other Chapters.|.Reviews.|.Contact.|.About.|.Home

—————————————————————————————————————————
Chapters: Introduction.|.1.|.2.|.3.|.4.|.5.|.6.|.7.|.8.|.9.|.10.|.11.|.12.|.Conclusion.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
© Mathieu Deflem. The pull quotes are copyrighted by Cambridge University Press.

 www.socoflaw.net
XSociology of Law by Mathieu Deflem - Chapter 4
sociology of law, Mathieu Deflem, Cambridge University Press, law, legal, socio-legal studies, law and society, socoflaw, socoflaw.net, www.socoflaw.net, soclaw, www.soclaw.org, www.soclaw.com, www.soclaw.net, soclaw, www.soclaw.com
Sociology of Law | By Mathieu Deflem | Cambridge University Press